Criteria This medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for thirty consecutive or for six... This medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for thirty consecutive or for sixty non-consecutive days, or who meet the following criteria: Be engaged in combat during an armed engagement, regardless of the time in the area of elibility; Is wounded or injured in the line of duty and requires medical evacuation from the area of eligibility; While participating as a regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, or within the area of eligibility in direct support of military operations. Each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these criteria shall count as one day toward the 30 or 60 day requirement; Personnel who serve in operations and exercises conducted in the area of eligibility are considered for the award as long as the basic time criteria are met. Due to the extensive time period for KDSM eligibility, the non-consecutive service period for eligibility remains cumulative throughout the entire period. The Area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the Republic of Korea, and the continuous water out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land and water areas. MoreHide
Comments The Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized to members of the Armed Forces who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954 to a date to be ... The Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized to members of the Armed Forces who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined. The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the Republic of Korea, and the contiguous water out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the land and water areas.
Submitted Self-Certifying Affidavit - Team Spirit 93 - SOTG, III MEF, Camp Muchuk, Korea 15 Feb - 25 Mar 93. MoreHide
Criteria The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous ... The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous or meritorious achievement which renders that unit outstanding compared to other units performing similar service, but not sufficient to justify the award of the Navy Unit Commendation. MoreHide
Description
Awarded to 26 MEU (SOC) for period 1 May 96 - 31 Jul 98. MARADMIN 098/00 CMC msg 240700Z Feb 00.
Criteria The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Natio... The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Nations or friendly foreign nations MoreHide
Comments
MARADMIN 262/99 CMC msg 110900Z Jun 99 Awarded for participation in Operation Joint Endeavor in support of NATO/IFOR operations in Bosnia.
Criteria The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous ... The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous or meritorious achievement which renders that unit outstanding compared to other units performing similar service, but not sufficient to justify the award of the Navy Unit Commendation. MoreHide
Description
Awarded to TF Silver Wake - Cmd Element, 26 MEU SOC for Operation Silver Wake 12 Mar 97 to 14 Jul 97. MARADMIN 115/98 CMC msg 181634Z Nov 98; correct in MARADMIN 106/99 CMC msg 161100Z Mar 99.
Criteria The Humanitarian Service Medal is an individual award, presented to individuals who are physically present at the site of immediate relief and who directly contribute to and influence the humanitarian... The Humanitarian Service Medal is an individual award, presented to individuals who are physically present at the site of immediate relief and who directly contribute to and influence the humanitarian action. The Humanitarian Service Medal is only awarded for service during the identified "period of immediate relief;" eligibility for the Humanitarian Service Medal terminates once (if) the humanitarian action evolves into an "established ongoing operation beyond the initial emergency condition." MoreHide
Comments
Awarded for Operation Silver Wake 13 Mar 97 to 24 Mar 97. ALMAR 134/98 CMC msg 031915Z Apr 98. Verified by name at https://lnweb1.manpower.usmc.mil/manpower/mm/mmma/AwardsVerification.nsf/search
Criteria The Armed Forces Service Medal provides recognition to participants who deploy to the designated area of eligibility for the qualifying operation. Outstanding or meritorious performance of nondeployed... The Armed Forces Service Medal provides recognition to participants who deploy to the designated area of eligibility for the qualifying operation. Outstanding or meritorious performance of nondeployed or remotely located support units and individuals is not justification for award of this medal (such performance may be recognized by appropriate unit and/or individual decorations). MoreHide
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Description Operation Silver Wake was a non-combatant evacuation operation (NEO) led by the United States to evacuate American citizens, noncombatants and designated third country nationals from Albania in March Operation Silver Wake was a non-combatant evacuation operation (NEO) led by the United States to evacuate American citizens, noncombatants and designated third country nationals from Albania in March 1997. The operation was performed by U.S. Marines from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit conducting operations from the USS Nassau Amphibious Readiness Group. U.S. Marines from 1st Battalion, 8th Marines secured the U.S. housing compound and held the U.S. Embassy. Over 900 personnel were evacuated during the course of the operation.... More
Description Operation Guardian Retrieval was conducted in response to the unstable situation in the Democratic Peoples Republic Of The Congo (formerly Zaire) in the period March-June 1997.
Following factional fiOperation Guardian Retrieval was conducted in response to the unstable situation in the Democratic Peoples Republic Of The Congo (formerly Zaire) in the period March-June 1997.
Following factional fighting in Rwanda and the successful gains by Tutsi rebels many Hutus fled in mass into Eastern Zaire. This large exodus resulted in massive refugee camps in Eastern Zaire creating regions of instability and increased tensions. Many non-government organizations (NGO) and private volunteer organizations (PVO) were working in these camps to ease the suffering of the refugees. Continued fighting between the various factions lead to the looting and pilfering of many villages in eastern Zaire endangering those US citizens working with the NGO/PVO. With the increasingly uncertain hostile environment preparations were made for the US Army Southern European Task Force (SETAF) to establish a Joint Task Force Headquarters for the evacuation of US citizens from Zaire.
In November 1996, Nassau (LHA 4) departed on Mediterranean Amphibious Ready Group (MARG 97-1) deployment. While deployed, Nassau participated in Operation SILVER WAKE, the non-combatant evacuation of Albania. While off station in Albania, Nassau was ordered to redeploy in support of Operation GUARDIAN RETRIEVAL. As conditions in Kinshasa deteriorated, Nassau (LHA 4), with elements of the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) (MEU(SOC)) on board, was dispatched off the coast of Zaire, steaming the 5123 nm at a continuous 20 knots. The remainder of the 26th MEU(SOC) Forward on board Nashville (LPD 13) and Pensacola (LSD 38) remained in the Mediterranean Sea to provide strategic reserve for the NATO Stabilization Force (SFOR) in Bosnia. The 26th MEU(SOC) assumed the main effort of a planned noncombatant evacuation operation named Joint Task Force Guardian Retrieval. Nassau remained on station for approximately one month in support of this operation, returning to Norfolk in May 1997. Kearsarge (LHD 3) and the 22d MEU(SOC) deployed two weeks early to relieve Nassau and the 26th MEU(SOC); the former assumed responsibility for the Joint Task Force (JTF) mission on 2 May 1997.
The vast continent of Africa provides some real challenges to a military planner as well as fuel suppliers. Re-supply for remote facilities can take several days to transport jet fuel one way, in extremely difficult terrain. Limited bridger support (truck-transport) and small storage tanks are commonplace. During Operation Guardian Retrieval, the Air Force planned missions through Libreville, Gabon, expecting a certain amount of fuel based on contractor stated capabilities. Their capability was no where near this quantity, and the airport even ran out of fuel at one point.
Noncombatant evacuation operations (NEO) are conducted to support the Department of State (DOS) in evacuating noncombatants and nonessential military personnel from locations in a foreign nation to an appropriate safe haven and/or the United States. NEO are a cooperative effort between the DOS, the JTF and possibly the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). Occasionally, as SETAF discovered the Embassy team may have limited experience with its role in a NEO and will quite possibly look for clarity and guidance from the Joint Task Force. The SETAF JTF had to be careful in giving guidance and building the plan, always keeping the team informed and avoiding any implications of seeming to "take over" or to drive the Department of State process too hard. The end result was a plan with clear roles and responsibilities for the country team, agreed to by all parties and rehearsed to various degrees. The plan developed by the JTF and the Country team placed DOS representatives in 4 locations to support the NEO.... More
Criteria Thirty days continuous or accumulated service in direct support of NATO operations, on land, at sea or in the air spaces of the Former Yugoslavia, Albania, the Former Republic of Macedonia, and the Ad... Thirty days continuous or accumulated service in direct support of NATO operations, on land, at sea or in the air spaces of the Former Yugoslavia, Albania, the Former Republic of Macedonia, and the Adriatic Sea (the theatre of operations) commencing 1 July 1992 and ending 31 December 2002; or Ninety days continuous or accumulated service commencing 1 July 1992 and ending 31 December 2002, in the territories of Italy, Greece, Hungary and Austria, in direct support of the NATO operations in the Former Yugoslavia (the adjacent area). MoreHide
Description Beginning in December 1995, US and allied nations deployed peacekeeping forces to Bosnia in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. Task Force Eagle, comprised of 20,000 American soldiers, was the US comBeginning in December 1995, US and allied nations deployed peacekeeping forces to Bosnia in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. Task Force Eagle, comprised of 20,000 American soldiers, was the US component of NATO's Implementation Force (IFOR) and was tasked with implementing the military elements of the Dayton Peace Accords in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. Task Force Eagle was the lead element for NATO's Multinational Division (North) or MND(N). Operation Joint Endeavor marked the first commitment of forces in NATO's history, as well as the first time since World War II that American and Russian soldiers had shared a common mission. Thousands of people were alive in Bosnia because of these soldiers' service. On 20 December 1996, the IFOR mandate ended and NATO established a new operation, Operation Joint Guard, along with a new Stabilisation Force (SFOR) to replace IFOR. Task Force Eagle remained the title for the US contingent supporting this new operation.
Multinational Division (North) and Task Force Eagle's history began in 1995 following the NATO-imposed cease-fire, halting the destructive 4-year Balkan conflict. After the General Framework Agreement for Peace was signed on 14 December 1995, the United States 1st Armored Division, as part of NATO's Allied Command Europe, Rapid Reaction Corps, was ordered to Bosnia-Herzegovina as part of Operation Joint Endeavor. There it formed the nucleus of Task Force Eagle and assumed control of its area of responsibility on 20 December 1995. After the historic bridging of the Sava river on 31 December 1995, the Old Ironsides Division, with supporting Forces from the V Corps, was joined by Nordic-Polish, Turkish, and Russian Brigades, with contingents from 12 nations. These nations included Estonia, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Denmark, Lithuania, Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Russia, Turkey, and the United States.
Task Force Eagle, one of the most powerful formations ever fielded, enforced the cease fire, supervised the marking of boundaries and the zone of separation between the former warring factions, enforced the withdrawal of the combatants to their barracks and the movement of heavy weapons to designated storage sites. Task Force Eagle also supported the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe's efforts to administer the country's first ever, democratic national elections.
In the first 3 months of Operation Joint Endeavor, US Air Force mobility forces flew 3,000 missions, carried over 15,600 troops and delivered more than 30,100 short tons of cargo. These statistics reflected the presence of the C-17, which was systematically employed in a major contingency for the first time during the operation. The limited airfield at Tuzla, was the major port of debarkation in Bosnia-Herzegovina. During the first critical month of operations, the C-17 flew slightly more than 20 percent of the missions into, Tuzla but delivered over 50 percent of the cargo.
On 10 November 1996, the 1st Armored Division transferred authority for command and control of MND(N) and Task Force Eagle to the 1st Infantry Division. The 1st Infantry Division deployed as a covering force to allow the safe return of the 1st Armored Division units to their homes in Germany. Shortly thereafter, demonstrations in the villages of Celic and Gajevi tested the resolve and ability of the newly arrived Big Red One. On 12 November 1996, an armed altercation between the former warring factions occurred, which could have hindered the fragile peace process. The soldiers of the 1st Infantry Division skillfully intervened and quickly brought the very intense situation under control. Upon completion of the covering force mission, the 1st Infantry Division continued to ensure all military aspects of the Dayton Peace Accord were accomplished firmly and fairly.
During Operation Joint Endeavor, deployed intelligence personnel provided aircrews and staffs at several locations with critical threat information and airfield data. Taking advantage of the Combat Intelligence System (CIS) capabilities and an emerging global connectivity to military networks and databases, intelligence personnel provided the best and most timely support ever to air mobility forces. This improvement was particularly evident during the Mission Report (MISREP) process, when intelligence analysts used CIS to provide MISREP data very quickly to aircrews and staffs, ensuring the people in need of this intelligence received it while the data was still useful.
The European Command's ARG/MEU(SOC) was assigned as theater reserve for NATO forces, while Naval Mobile Construction Battalions 133 and 40 constructed base camps for implementation force personnel. In addition, from June to October 1996 a Marine Corps unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) squadron, VMU-1, supported the operation with Pioneer UAV imagery both to US and multinational units. VMU-1 was subsequently replaced by VMU-2, which continued to provide similar support.
The US Army Intelligence and Security Command's (INSCOM) Military Intelligence Battalion (Low Intensity) was originally notified of participation in Operation Joint Endeavor in the fall of 1995. The Airborne Reconnaissance - Low (ARL) system, however, was actually deployed for use in the US European Command theater from 28 January 1996 through 19 April 1996, with approximately 60 personnel, including 12 contracted civilian aircraft maintenance personnel from Rayethon, AVTAIL, and California Microwave Industries. During that time, the unit conducted 39 missions totaling 224.1 flight hours of imagery over Bosnia. After considerable coordination, US Southern Command finally released the ARL for a second deployment, this time from 8 August 1996 through 3 October 1996. On the second deployment, the unit conducted 33 missions totaling 197.1 flight hours of imagery over Bosnia. During the second deployment, there were 4 3-man Aerial Reconnaissance Support Teams deployed, one each in the the British (southwest) sector; the US (northern) sector in Tuzla; the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) in Sarajevo; and the French sector in Mostar. The Battalion also flew over 700 flight hours in support of the imagery efforts using RC-12 aircraft from C Company. In addition to the manned aircraft, the Battalion also deployed with the RQ-1 Predator UAV for the period 7 March 1996 through 2 September 1996. To operate the UAV, the unit formed a company as a detachment, called Detachment 3. It was a joint unit with personnel from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and the Marine Corps. Responsibility for the system transferred to the US Air Force's 11th Reconnaissance Squadron on 2 September 1996.... More
Description Beginning in December 1995, US and allied nations deployed peacekeeping forces to Bosnia in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. Task Force Eagle, comprised of 20,000 American soldiers, was the US comBeginning in December 1995, US and allied nations deployed peacekeeping forces to Bosnia in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. Task Force Eagle, comprised of 20,000 American soldiers, was the US component of NATO's Implementation Force (IFOR) and was tasked with implementing the military elements of the Dayton Peace Accords in support of Operation Joint Endeavor. Task Force Eagle was the lead element for NATO's Multinational Division (North) or MND(N). Operation Joint Endeavor marked the first commitment of forces in NATO's history, as well as the first time since World War II that American and Russian soldiers had shared a common mission. Thousands of people were alive in Bosnia because of these soldiers' service. On 20 December 1996, the IFOR mandate ended and NATO established a new operation, Operation Joint Guard, along with a new Stabilisation Force (SFOR) to replace IFOR. Task Force Eagle remained the title for the US contingent supporting this new operation.
Multinational Division (North) and Task Force Eagle's history began in 1995 following the NATO-imposed cease-fire, halting the destructive 4-year Balkan conflict. After the General Framework Agreement for Peace was signed on 14 December 1995, the United States 1st Armored Division, as part of NATO's Allied Command Europe, Rapid Reaction Corps, was ordered to Bosnia-Herzegovina as part of Operation Joint Endeavor. There it formed the nucleus of Task Force Eagle and assumed control of its area of responsibility on 20 December 1995. After the historic bridging of the Sava river on 31 December 1995, the Old Ironsides Division, with supporting Forces from the V Corps, was joined by Nordic-Polish, Turkish, and Russian Brigades, with contingents from 12 nations. These nations included Estonia, Latvia, Finland, Poland, Denmark, Lithuania, Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Russia, Turkey, and the United States.
Task Force Eagle, one of the most powerful formations ever fielded, enforced the cease fire, supervised the marking of boundaries and the zone of separation between the former warring factions, enforced the withdrawal of the combatants to their barracks and the movement of heavy weapons to designated storage sites. Task Force Eagle also supported the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe's efforts to administer the country's first ever, democratic national elections.
In the first 3 months of Operation Joint Endeavor, US Air Force mobility forces flew 3,000 missions, carried over 15,600 troops and delivered more than 30,100 short tons of cargo. These statistics reflected the presence of the C-17, which was systematically employed in a major contingency for the first time during the operation. The limited airfield at Tuzla, was the major port of debarkation in Bosnia-Herzegovina. During the first critical month of operations, the C-17 flew slightly more than 20 percent of the missions into, Tuzla but delivered over 50 percent of the cargo.
On 10 November 1996, the 1st Armored Division transferred authority for command and control of MND(N) and Task Force Eagle to the 1st Infantry Division. The 1st Infantry Division deployed as a covering force to allow the safe return of the 1st Armored Division units to their homes in Germany. Shortly thereafter, demonstrations in the villages of Celic and Gajevi tested the resolve and ability of the newly arrived Big Red One. On 12 November 1996, an armed altercation between the former warring factions occurred, which could have hindered the fragile peace process. The soldiers of the 1st Infantry Division skillfully intervened and quickly brought the very intense situation under control. Upon completion of the covering force mission, the 1st Infantry Division continued to ensure all military aspects of the Dayton Peace Accord were accomplished firmly and fairly.
During Operation Joint Endeavor, deployed intelligence personnel provided aircrews and staffs at several locations with critical threat information and airfield data. Taking advantage of the Combat Intelligence System (CIS) capabilities and an emerging global connectivity to military networks and databases, intelligence personnel provided the best and most timely support ever to air mobility forces. This improvement was particularly evident during the Mission Report (MISREP) process, when intelligence analysts used CIS to provide MISREP data very quickly to aircrews and staffs, ensuring the people in need of this intelligence received it while the data was still useful.
The European Command's ARG/MEU(SOC) was assigned as theater reserve for NATO forces, while Naval Mobile Construction Battalions 133 and 40 constructed base camps for implementation force personnel. In addition, from June to October 1996 a Marine Corps unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) squadron, VMU-1, supported the operation with Pioneer UAV imagery both to US and multinational units. VMU-1 was subsequently replaced by VMU-2, which continued to provide similar support.
The US Army Intelligence and Security Command's (INSCOM) Military Intelligence Battalion (Low Intensity) was originally notified of participation in Operation Joint Endeavor in the fall of 1995. The Airborne Reconnaissance - Low (ARL) system, however, was actually deployed for use in the US European Command theater from 28 January 1996 through 19 April 1996, with approximately 60 personnel, including 12 contracted civilian aircraft maintenance personnel from Rayethon, AVTAIL, and California Microwave Industries. During that time, the unit conducted 39 missions totaling 224.1 flight hours of imagery over Bosnia. After considerable coordination, US Southern Command finally released the ARL for a second deployment, this time from 8 August 1996 through 3 October 1996. On the second deployment, the unit conducted 33 missions totaling 197.1 flight hours of imagery over Bosnia. During the second deployment, there were 4 3-man Aerial Reconnaissance Support Teams deployed, one each in the the British (southwest) sector; the US (northern) sector in Tuzla; the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) in Sarajevo; and the French sector in Mostar. The Battalion also flew over 700 flight hours in support of the imagery efforts using RC-12 aircraft from C Company. In addition to the manned aircraft, the Battalion also deployed with the RQ-1 Predator UAV for the period 7 March 1996 through 2 September 1996. To operate the UAV, the unit formed a company as a detachment, called Detachment 3. It was a joint unit with personnel from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and the Marine Corps. Responsibility for the system transferred to the US Air Force's 11th Reconnaissance Squadron on 2 September 1996.... More
Description Operation Provide Promise was a humanitarian relief operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Yugoslav Wars, from 2 July 1992, to 9 January 1996, which made it the longest running humanitarian aiOperation Provide Promise was a humanitarian relief operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Yugoslav Wars, from 2 July 1992, to 9 January 1996, which made it the longest running humanitarian airlift in history.
By the end of the operation, aircraft from 21 countries had flown 12,886 sorties into Sarajevo, delivering 159,622 tons of food, medicine, and supplies and evacuating over 1,300 wounded people. The US flew 3,951 C-130, 236 C-141, and 10 C-17 airland sorties (delivering 62,801.5 tons), as well as 2,222 C-130 air-drop sorties.... More
Criteria The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. ... The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. Marine Corps while on active duty for a specified period of time. MoreHide
Comments
Sixth Award - 14 June 1992 to 13 June 1995.
Description Operation Deny Flight was a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) operation that began on 12 April 1993 as the enforcement of a United Nations (UN) no-fly zone over Bosnia and Herzegovina. The UniOperation Deny Flight was a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) operation that began on 12 April 1993 as the enforcement of a United Nations (UN) no-fly zone over Bosnia and Herzegovina. The United Nations and NATO later expanded the mission of the operation to include providing close air support for UN troops in Bosnia and carrying out coercive air strikes against targets in Bosnia. Twelve NATO members contributed forces to the operation and, by its end on 20 December 1995, NATO pilots had flown 100,420 sorties.
The operation played an important role in shaping both the Bosnian War and NATO. The operation included the first combat engagement in NATO's history, a 28 February 1994 air battle over Banja Luka, and in April 1994, NATO aircraft first bombed ground targets in an operation near Goražde. These engagements helped show that NATO had adapted to the post-Cold War era and could operate in environments other than a major force on force engagement on the plains of Central Europe. Cooperation between the UN and NATO during the operation also helped pave the way for future joint operations. Although it helped establish UN-NATO relations, Deny Flight led to conflict between the two organizations. Most notably, significant tension arose between the two after UN peacekeepers were taken as hostages in response to NATO bombing.
The operations of Deny Flight spanned more than two years of the Bosnian War and played an important role in the course of that conflict. The no-fly zone operations of Deny Flight proved successful in preventing significant use of air power by any side in the conflict. Additionally, the air strikes flown during Deny Flight led to Operation Deliberate Force, a massive NATO bombing campaign in Bosnia that played a key role in ending the war.... More
Best Friends
CWO3 David Jones - liberty in London and the last train back to Southampton.
Best Moment
The highlight of this cruise was taking part in the D-Day 50th Anniversary commemoration in England and France.
Worst Moment
The transit through the Red Sea. It was so hot that everyone was restricted to inside the skin of the ship unless absolutely essential. The tops of the ships were painted white to reflect the heat.
Chain of Command
MEU CO: Col. P.T. Metzger S-2: Maj. T.J. Meyer S-2A: Capt. P. Gentile HET OIC & CI Officer: CWO3 David Jones HET NCOIC & ITT SubTm Cmdr: GySgt Snell ITT: SSgt. Curtis Ferrell ITT: Sgt. A. Espinoza CI: Sgt. E. Evans CI: Sgt. G. Heyborne
Other Memories
In 1994, I was assigned to Permanent Shore Patrol while with 26 MEU SOC onboard USS Guam. We were on a portcall in Corfu, Greece and I had duty. We had a shore patrol station set up at the pier and were running boats.
About 2130 three of my shore patrol came to the pier carrying a really, really drunk sailor. This guy was out of it, and really combative, so much that I had to put cuffs on him. This didn't help much, so we put irons on his ankles, but he still fought. The shore patrol had him on the ground, but it was starting to get pretty rough, and I didn't want any of the shore patrol members to get in trouble for excessive force, so I put my knee on his ear and held him down and had the rest of the shore patrol back off.
In the meantime, the ship's Captain came by and identified the young sailor as his yeoman, and said that I couldn't send him back to the ship until he sobered up because he was afraid he'd fall off the boat and drown. I really didn't want to have to keep watch over this kid until morning, so I radioed out to the ship and had them send out two stokes stretchers on the next boat.
When they arrived, I put the sailor, who was still fighting, in one stretcher then put the second over him like a coffin - or clamshell - and strapped the two together. That held him til morning, when I could get him on a boat back to the ship. For the rest of the cruise, I was known as Gunny "Clamshell."
Criteria The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Natio... The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces who, after July 1, 1958, participate in specified United States operations or those in direct support of the United Nations or friendly foreign nations MoreHide
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
On 4 May 1993 the UN Operation in Somalia (UNOSOM II) assumed responsibility for operations, but the transition was badly managed. Basic U.N. deficiencies in planning, C3I, and political acumen were c
On 4 May 1993 the UN Operation in Somalia (UNOSOM II) assumed responsibility for operations, but the transition was badly managed. Basic U.N. deficiencies in planning, C3I, and political acumen were compounded by an expanded and intrusive mandate; greatly diminished military capabilities; more aggressive Somali opposition; uncertain support from the United States; differences within the coalition; and uncertainty by the Security Council, the Secretariat, and others.
Operation Continue Hope provided support of UNOSOM II to establish a secure environment for humanitarian relief operations by providing personnel, logistical, communications, intelligence support, a quick reaction force, and other elements as required. Over 60 Army aircraft and approximately 1,000 aviation personnel operated in Somalia from 1992 to 1994.
UNOSOM II became a badly flawed peace, with military forces which came to be seen by parties to the local conflict as co-belligerents rather than impartial peacekeepers. In Somalia, peace enforcement was only an implicit element of the original U.N. mandate, which focused on peace-building (disarmament, political reconciliation, and economic rehabilitation). However, after a confrontation between the Somali National Alliance (SNA) and the U.N. led to the killing of twenty-five Pakistani peacekeepers, the Security Council made the operation's peace-enforcement mission explicit. It was executed by both U.N. forces and a 1,000-man U.S. rapid-reaction force under U.S. operational control, with the authority of the United Nations. There was also a 3,000-man U.S. logistics unit under U.N. operational control. A lack of decisiveness, cohesion, and command and control by the undermanned U.N. mission (half the strength of UNITAF, with some 20,000 personnel) and a series of armed clashes between U.S./U.N. forces and the SNA created a virtual state of war and undermined the effectiveness of the U.N. operation. Confusion over the dual-command relationship between the U.S. and UNOSOM II was another complicating factor, with a U.S. general officer serving as both the U.N. deputy forces commander and commander of U.S. forces.
A clash on 3-4 October 1993 left eighteen U.S. personnel dead and seventy-eight wounded, along with over one thousand Somali casualties. Public outcry in the United States contributed to the decision to withdraw U.S. forces in March 1994. That, coupled with continued internal strife and SNA hostility toward the U.N., led to a total U.N. withdrawal in March 1995. This was executed skillfully, without casualties, in a carefully planned combined U.S.-U.N. action.
The killing of Army Rangers in Somalia provoked a resurgence of a debate that began before the Gulf War: when is it appropriate to use military force -- and, more to the point, can you justify using the military in regions in which Americans either do not see their interests at stake or are willing to help only so long as the costs remain very low? Somalia drove home the reality that the Gulf War experience could not serve as a model for other situations where the diplomatic lineup was more confused, the stakes less clear, and the difference between good guys and bad guys less simple to discern. It was also an early indication of the coming debate on the international community's role in internal strife.
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Criteria The Defense Meritorious Service Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces who, while serving in a joint activity, distinguish themselves by noncombat outs... The Defense Meritorious Service Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces who, while serving in a joint activity, distinguish themselves by noncombat outstanding achievement or meritorious service, but not of a degree to warrant award of the Defense Superior Service Medal. MoreHide
Comments For exceptionally meritorious service from May 1990 to November 1992 while serving as Manager for Marine Corps Language Programs, Defense Language Institute. Signed by General Frederick Franks, Comma... For exceptionally meritorious service from May 1990 to November 1992 while serving as Manager for Marine Corps Language Programs, Defense Language Institute. Signed by General Frederick Franks, Commander, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. MoreHide
Criteria The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces in the grades of lieutenant commander (or major) and below. It is awarded for meritorious service or achieveme... The Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces in the grades of lieutenant commander (or major) and below. It is awarded for meritorious service or achievement in either combat or noncombat based on sustained performance or specific achievement of a superlative nature but which does not warrant a Navy Commendation Medal or higher. It may not be awarded for service involving participation in aerial flight after January 1, 1969. MoreHide
Comments For professional achievement while serving as Marine Corps Language Program Staff Noncommissioned Officer in Charge, Marine Corps Detachment, Defense Language Institute from May 1990 through January 1... For professional achievement while serving as Marine Corps Language Program Staff Noncommissioned Officer in Charge, Marine Corps Detachment, Defense Language Institute from May 1990 through January 1992. MoreHide
Criteria The Navy Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself by outstanding heroism in action against an enemy (but not suff... The Navy Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself by outstanding heroism in action against an enemy (but not sufficiently to justify the award of the Presidential Unit Citation). It may also be awarded to a unit that distinguishes itself by extremely meritorious service not involving combat (but in support of military operations), which renders that unit outstanding when compared to other units performing similar service. MoreHide
Description
Awarded to I MEF for Desert Shield/Desert Storm for period 14 Aug 1990 to 16 Apr 1991.
Criteria The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. ... The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. Marine Corps while on active duty for a specified period of time. MoreHide
Comments
Fifth Award - 14 June 1989 to 13 June 1992.
Criteria The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service... The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the war against Iraq in the Persian Gulf, and for service during the current War on Terrorism. In addition, all members of the National Guard and Reserve who were part of the Selected Reserve in good standing between August 2, 1990, to November 30, 1995, are eligible for the National Defense Service Medal. In the case of Navy personnel, Midshipment attending the Naval Academy during the qualifying periods are eligible for this award, and Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) Midshipmen ae only eligible if they participated in a summer cruise that was in an area which qualified for a campaign medal. MoreHide
Comments (1) Honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces for any of the following periods, all dates inclusive: 27 June 1950 to 28 July 1954; 1 January 1961 to 14 August 1974; 2 August 1990 to 30 ... (1) Honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces for any of the following periods, all dates inclusive: 27 June 1950 to 28 July 1954; 1 January 1961 to 14 August 1974; 2 August 1990 to 30 November 1995; and 12 September 2001 to a date to be determined. MoreHide
Criteria The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west ... The Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded for service in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees North latitude and west of 68 degrees East longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Individuals serving between January 17, 1991, and November 30, 1995, in Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Syria, and Jordan (including their air space and territorial waters) are also eligible; however, they must have directly supported combat operations (e.g., embassy guards are not eligible). MoreHide
Comments
With one campaign star. I was deployed to SWA and arrived one day after the start of the air war to support I MEF as a Liaison Chief to the 3rd Egyptian Corps.
Criteria Service must have been performed in support of Operation Desert Storm and the liberation of Kuwait, between 17 January 1991 to 28 February 1991. Eligible areas include: The Persian Gulf, The Red Sea, ... Service must have been performed in support of Operation Desert Storm and the liberation of Kuwait, between 17 January 1991 to 28 February 1991. Eligible areas include: The Persian Gulf, The Red Sea, That portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees north latitude and west of 68 degrees east longitude, The Gulf of Aden or The total areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates In addition, those personnel must have: Been attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore operations; Been attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; Actually participated as a crew member in one or more aerial flights supporting military operations in the areas designated above; or, Served on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days during the qualifying period. Note: That time limitation may be waived for personnel who actually participated in combat operations. MoreHide
Description
Awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for direct participation in Operation Desert Storm between 17 January 1991 and 28 February 1991.
Criteria Awarded to members of the Military Coalition who served in support of Operation Desert Shield or Desert Storm in one or more of the following areas between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993: Persian Gu... Awarded to members of the Military Coalition who served in support of Operation Desert Shield or Desert Storm in one or more of the following areas between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993: Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion of the Arabian Sea that lies north of 10 degrees north latitude and west of 68 degrees east longitude, as well as the total land areas of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. MoreHide
Description
Awarded by the Emirate of Kuwait to US Armed Forces personnel who participated in operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm between 2 August 1990 and 31 August 1993.
Description On January 16, 1991, President George H. W. Bush announced the start of what would be called Operation Desert Storm—a military operation to expel occupying Iraqi forces from Kuwait, which Iraq had invOn January 16, 1991, President George H. W. Bush announced the start of what would be called Operation Desert Storm—a military operation to expel occupying Iraqi forces from Kuwait, which Iraq had invaded and annexed months earlier. For weeks, a U.S.-led coalition of two dozen nations had positioned more than 900,000 troops in the region, most stationed on the Saudi-Iraq border. A U.N.-declared deadline for withdrawal passed on January 15, with no action from Iraq, so coalition forces began a five-week bombardment of Iraqi command and control targets from air and sea. Despite widespread fears that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein might order the use of chemical weapons, a ground invasion followed in February. Coalition forces swiftly drove Iraq from Kuwait, advancing into Iraq, and reaching a cease-fire within 100 hours—controversially leaving Saddam Hussein in power. While coalition casualties were in the hundreds, Iraqi losses numbered in the tens of thousands.... More
Memories
Assigned as Liaison Chief to the 3rd Egyptian Corps.
Criteria The Joint Service Achievement Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces below the grade of colonel (or captain in the Navy) who, while assigned to a joint... The Joint Service Achievement Medal is awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense to members of the Armed Forces below the grade of colonel (or captain in the Navy) who, while assigned to a joint activity, distinguish themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service, but not to the degree that would warrant award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal. MoreHide
Comments
For exceptionally meritorious achievement from 6 March 1990 to 31 October 1990 while serving with the Language Program Coordination Office, Defense Language Institute, Foreign Language Center.
Criteria The Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal may be awarded to service members who, while serving in any capacity with the Navy or Marine Corps, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievem... The Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal may be awarded to service members who, while serving in any capacity with the Navy or Marine Corps, distinguish themselves by heroism, outstanding achievement or meritorious service (but not of sufficient nature to warrant a higher decoration). MoreHide
Comments For meritorious service while serving as Senior Arabic Linguist and Assistant Instructor, Marine Corps Mobile Training Team, Mauritania, West Africa from November 1988 to March 1989. Signed by Genera... For meritorious service while serving as Senior Arabic Linguist and Assistant Instructor, Marine Corps Mobile Training Team, Mauritania, West Africa from November 1988 to March 1989. Signed by General Alfred M. Gray, Commandant, U.S. Marine Corps MoreHide
Criteria The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. ... The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. Marine Corps while on active duty for a specified period of time. MoreHide
Comments
Fourth Award - 14 June 1986 to 13 June 1989.
Criteria The Arctic Service Ribbon is awarded to military personnel the Navy and Marine Corps and to civilian citizens, nationals, or resident aliens of the United States for 28 days of service above the Arcti... The Arctic Service Ribbon is awarded to military personnel the Navy and Marine Corps and to civilian citizens, nationals, or resident aliens of the United States for 28 days of service above the Arctic Circle. For personnel working at remote ice camps and divers working under the ice, each day of duty will count as two days when determining award eligibility. There are no subsequent awards of this ribbon. MoreHide
Description For participation in operations in support of the Arctic Warfare Program on or after 1 January 1982.
Awarded for Exercise Cold Winter 83 while deployed to North Norway with RLT 2 as part of 26 MAU.... For participation in operations in support of the Arctic Warfare Program on or after 1 January 1982.
Awarded for Exercise Cold Winter 83 while deployed to North Norway with RLT 2 as part of 26 MAU. MoreHide
Criteria The Navy Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself by outstanding heroism in action against an enemy (but not suff... The Navy Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself by outstanding heroism in action against an enemy (but not sufficiently to justify the award of the Presidential Unit Citation). It may also be awarded to a unit that distinguishes itself by extremely meritorious service not involving combat (but in support of military operations), which renders that unit outstanding when compared to other units performing similar service. MoreHide
Description The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the Navy Unit Commendation to
USS GUADALCANAL (LPH 7) AND EMBARKED UNITS
for service as set forth in the following citation:
For exceptionally merit... The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the Navy Unit Commendation to
USS GUADALCANAL (LPH 7) AND EMBARKED UNITS
for service as set forth in the following citation:
For exceptionally meritorious service in support of national policy objectives in the Indian Ocean and Arabian Gulf from 29 July 1987 to 14 November 1987. In response to the Joint Chiefs of Staff tasking during MARG 3-87 to proceed to the Arabian Gulf for Airborne Mine Countermeasures operations, USS GUADALCANAL (LPH 7) and embarked units conducted an extensive, highly successful, and unprecedented ship reconfiguration effort and then broke new ground by integrating Navy airborne mine countermeasure and Marine amphibious assault helicopters into an effective joint force that demonstrated outstanding responsiveness to Arabian Gulf threats and missions. Completing a flawless covert transit to the Arabian Gulf through expert and imaginative use of EMCON, deception, and environmental factors, USS GUADALCANAL and her embarked units immediately commenced extended and varied airborne mine countermeasures and convoy escort duties in support of American-flagged tankers. Repeatedly called upon for contingency operations, USS GUADALCANAL participated in the capture of the Iranian mine-laying vessel IRAN AJAR, the destruction of the Rashadat Oil Platforms, rescue and repatriation of a downed Iraqi pilot, and emergency medical treatment and repatriation of Iranians injured in clashes with U.S. Forces. Additionally, USS GUADALCANAL maintained outstanding maintenance availability. By their resourcefulness, flexibility, and complete dedication to duty, the officers and enlisted personnel of USS GUADALCANAL (LPH 7) and embarked units reflected great credit upon themselves and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Criteria The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous ... The Meritorious Unit Commendation may be awarded by the Secretary of the Navy to any unit of the Navy or Marine Corps that distinguishes itself under combat or noncombat conditions by either valorous or meritorious achievement which renders that unit outstanding compared to other units performing similar service, but not sufficient to justify the award of the Navy Unit Commendation. MoreHide
Description The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the Meritorious Unit Commendation to
Amphibious Squadron Six / 24th Marine Amphibious Unit (Special Operations Capable)
for service as set forth in... The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the Meritorious Unit Commendation to
Amphibious Squadron Six / 24th Marine Amphibious Unit (Special Operations Capable)
for service as set forth in the following citation:
For meritorious service while deployed as Mediterranean Amphibious Ready Group/Landing Force SIXTH Fleet 3-87 to the Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean from 1 July 1987 to 31 October 1987. During this period, a series of major changes to the MARG/LF6F schedule tested fully the leadership and capabilities of the Sailors and Marines. USS AUSTIN (LPD 4) detached 11 July for boiler repairs in Naples; following an at-sea reconfiguration of assets, the four ship MARG entered the Indian Ocean on 15 July 1987. Joint Chief of Staff tasking of USS Guadalcanal (LPH 7) to support national objectives in the Persian Gulf reduced the force to three ships. After a hasty adjustment of assets, USS SPIEGEL GROVE (LSD 32), USS LA MOURE COUNTY (LST 1194), and USS SAGINAW (LST 1188) successfully conducted EASTERN WIND '87, a highly visible joint, combined arms amphibious exercise in the Democratic Republic of Somalia. USS AUSTIN, a non-flag configured LPD, assumed duties as Flagship for Commander Task Force SIXTY-ONE and Commander Task Force SIXTY-TWO and embarked a six-plane detachment of CH-46 Helicopters to maintain a vertical assault capability for the Amphibious Task Forrce (ATF). With USS AUSTIN as Flagship and primary aviation platform, the reconstituted ATF participated superbly in several bilateral and NATO exercises. A result of extraordinary adaptability and flexibility in an ever-changing scenario, national objectives were met during all phases of the deployment. By their continuous display of professionalism, determination, and total devotion to duty, the officers and enlisted personnal of Amphibious Squadron SIX/24TH MARINE AMPHIBIOUS UNIT (Special Operations Capable) reflected credit upon themselves and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Criteria The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. ... The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. Marine Corps while on active duty for a specified period of time. MoreHide
Comments
Third Award - 14 June 1983 to 13 June 1986.
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Criteria The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. ... The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. Marine Corps while on active duty for a specified period of time. MoreHide
Comments
Second Award - 14 June 1980 to 13 June 1983.
Other Memories
Assigned TAD to Hq, 2nd Marines for deployment with RLT-2 to North Norway for Exercise Cold Winter 83. Conducted pre-deployment cold weather training at Fort Drum, New York - it never snowed while we were there.
Best Moment
There were only 3 Sergeants (Marine) attending DLI and living in the barracks at the time. It was a Friday night, and I was at the NCO Club (at that time the place to be in Monterey) when one of the Corporals rushed up to my table in a panic asking for my roommate (Sgt Jiminez), who was out of town for the weekend. Sgt Jiminez was this Corporal's platoon sergeant. I told the Marine that Jiminez was out of town and asked him what was wrong. He stuttered but finally managed to get out the following: "I was in my room in the barracks sleeping when suddenly a naked girl came through the window." My first question was "Then what the hell are you doing here?" He was so flustered he couldn't answer, so I had him give me the key to his room and I went to the barracks, and sure enough there was a naked girl in his room. She was an Army private, who was dating one of the Marine PFC's. Somehow, she had managed to get into the PFC's room unnoticed to spend some quality time with him. She was drunk, and at some point, she had climbed out his window, gotten all the way around the barracks, and into the Corporal's window. The Corporal never recovered.
Chain of Command
CO, Marine Corps Administrative Detachment - Major P. Stonebarger
Other Memories
Marine Corps Birthday Balls and painting the Navy's anchor on the Marine Corps birthday. Painting the anchor was a major tactical operation, because the Squids guarded it like the Pentagon, but they never stopped us. By the morning of November 10th, it was always red and gold.
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Best Moment
Typhoon Patrols - As soon as the lights went out, we'd slip out of the barracks and down the ditch to the beach behind the tank ramp, then down the beach to Henoko, then through town to Keiko's, where we'd spend the worst of the storm drinking Orion beer and eating Yakisoba.
Worst Moment
Typhoon Tip and the Fuji fire!
Chain of Command
LtCol. R.H. Dietrich - Battalion Commander LtCol. T.M. Collins - Battalion Commander
Other Memories
Ash Dog Parties. We were one tight platoon. In those days, we worked half a day on Saturday; liberty was called about noon or so. I had the only vehicle in the platoon, so I'd spend the entire morning shuttling everyone else down to the package store at Camp Courtney to buy their ration of beer and liquor; we'd load the car up on each trip. Then we'd transport it to the beach out on the other side of Henoko Village, and stay there until Monday morning, making it back to the barracks just in time to get ready for PT. We would also take food with us (hotdogs and burgers) to cook over a fire, but we were usually so drunk that we would end up dropping it all in the fire and ashes, hence the name "Ash Dog Party." Our "ash dog" parties were so famous that even the Battalion C.O. showed up on one occasion. Whenever a typhoon hit, we'd wait for the lights to go out, put on our helmets and flak jackets, follow the benjo ditch to the beach, then around the fence into Henoko. There, we'd gather at Keiko's, drink Orion beer and eat Yakisoba until near morning, when we'd sneak back to the barracks. The Platoon Commander always wondered why the "Typhoon C-Rats" never got eaten. We were fun, but as said before, we were also tight. During the two years I was there, there was not a single office hours in our platoon. Except for major inspections, officers and Staff NCO's did not come into our barracks. They didn't have to. The reason was because the NCO's did their job and took care of any problems (usually after dark behind the barracks). And when we went on liberty, we went as a platoon, and no one came back until everyone came back. We took care of our own. And it showed; in 1980, our platoon took the CG's cup in soccer, and the CG's Inspection. We were good and we knew it. Of course, we were Marines!
Criteria The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. ... The Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal is awarded on a selective basis to enlisted members in the Regular Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve to recognize good behavior and faithful service in the U.S. Marine Corps while on active duty for a specified period of time. MoreHide
Criteria The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, f... The Sea Service Deployment Ribbon is awarded to members of the Navy and Marine Corps assigned to U.S. homeported (including Hawaii and Alaska) ships, deploying units, or Fleet Marine Force commands, for 12 months accumulated sea duty, or for duty with the Fleet Marine Force that includes at least one deployment of 90 consecutive days. MoreHide
Best Moment
I was assigned to CoB for most of my time here. But once I was sent TAD to CoD to deploy to Fort Pickett, Virginia for tank qualification. The Company Gunny for Company D was an old Master Sergeant, who seemed to us to be the most forgetfull person we'd ever seen. He would put together a working party, tell them to stand over by the barracks, then 15 minutes later, he would be looking everywhere for his working party. By the time he was finished, he'd have two or three working parties put together for the same task.
Other Memories
Assigned Extended Active Duty as a Recruiter's Aid. I was placed in the billet of the Reserve Recruiter and remained on active duty in this billet for nine months.
Best Moment
The funniest thing I ever saw was a fire bottle explosion during tank maintenance. I was out on the gun tube, cleaning the bore evacuator, while other members of the crew were inside the turret changing out the fire bottles (they were in the driver's compartment and put out fires in the engine compartment). One of those fire bottles went off inside the compartment, and the first thought was that something had exploded inside the tank. White CO2 shot out of the turret ring and the hatches, followed very closely by a young Marine who had been standing inside the loader's hatch. He was shot out of the hatch like a cannonball, straight up in the air by the pressure of the fire bottle. As for me, I was hightailing it up the gun tube trying my best to get the hell off of that tank.
Other Memories
I joined the Reserves when you could still join a unit, attend drills and receive pay, even though you hadn't yet been to Recruit Training. The unit only got a few quotas a year for Parris Island, so by the time I was sent to Book Camp, I had already been drilling for seven months and had been fully trained on the M48A3 main battle tank. Needless to say, I was already a pretty salty private when I arrived at Parris Island, and breaking some of that salt off was pretty painful. When I joined this unit, the Company was still equipped with M48A3 tanks. They were so old that when we went to the range, before firing the first round, we'd tie a rope to the manual firing lever, load a round, and run the rope out the TC's hatch and pull it just to make sure the gun wasn't going to blow up on us. We turned those tanks in to the Depot at Albany in the summer of 1978; several of us volunteered and drove the 48's all the way from Tallahassee to Albany in column. What a trip. We ended up towing half the column into the depot after they had broken down during the trip. But by next drill we had (new) M60A1 tanks.
Other Memories
I will never, ever, forget my training Platoon Sergeant. His name was Staff Sergeant LaRue, and he was called "Lash." He was a very friendly, jovial, and very large, dark green Marine with a "Mohawk" high and tight haircut. The man could walk through the mud all day and you could still shave in the reflection on his boots. Rumor had it that he had made it all the way to Master Sergeant, and had been busted somehow back to Staff Sergeant. He had the best Ooh Rah I have ever heard, and he used it every morning to call revelle, not only for the Marines, but also for the Doggies (Army) recruits who lived next door (and probably every other unit in the Disney Barracks area of Fort Knox. He also chewed tobacco, and whenever he went into the chow hall, he would take his cover off (the Marine instructors all wore campaign covers), set the cover on the table, and take his chew out of his mouth and set it in the point of the cover. When chow was over, he'd put the chew back in his mouth, his cover on his head, and MARCH out of the chow hall. He was a real Marine's Marine, and he taught us more than just how to be a tank crewman. He taught us pride and the meaning of the word MOTIVATION. One of the best Marines I've ever known; when I last saw him, he was a Sergeant Major. Extraordinary man!
MEU CO: Col Emerson Gardner